Metastasis Detection Using True and Artificial T1-Weighted Postcontrast Images in Brain MRI.
Investigative radiology
Authors:
Robert Haase, Thomas Pinetz, Erich Kobler, Zeynep Bendella, Daniel Paech, Ralf Clauberg, Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Verena Wagner, Kai Schlamp, Gudula Heussel, Claus Peter Heussel, Martin Vahlensieck, Julian A Luetkens, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Louisa Specht-Riemenschneider, Alexander Radbruch, Alexander Effland, Katerina Deike
OBJECTIVES: Small lesions are the limiting factor for reducing gadolinium-based contrast agents in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and precision in metastasis detection on true contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1w) images and artificial images synthesized by a deep learning method using low-dose images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter study (5 centers, 12 scanners), 917 participants underwent brain MRI between October 2021 and March 2023 including T1w low-dose (0.033 mmol/kg) and full-dose (0.1 mmol/kg) images. Forty participants with metastases or unremarkable brain findings were evaluated in a reading (mean age ± SD, 54.3 ± 15.1 years; 24 men). True and artificial T1w images were assessed for metastases in random order with 4 weeks between readings by 2 neuroradiologists. A reference reader reviewed all data to confirm metastases. Performances were compared using mid-P McNemar tests for sensitivity and Wilcoxon signed rank tests for false-positive findings.
RESULTS: The reference reader identified 97 metastases. The sensitivity of reader 1 did not differ significantly between sequences (sensitivity [precision]: true, 66.0% [98.5%]; artificial, 61.9% [98.4%]; P = 0.38). With a lower precision than reader 1, reader 2 found significantly more metastases using true images (sensitivity [precision]: true, 78.4% [87.4%]; artificial, 60.8% [80.8%]; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in sensitivity for metastases ≥5 mm. The number of false-positive findings did not differ significantly between sequences.
CONCLUSIONS: One reader showed a significantly higher overall sensitivity using true images. The similar detection performance for metastases ≥5 mm is promising for applying low-dose imaging in less challenging diagnostic tasks than metastasis detection.